Evolution of sex: Using experimental genomics to select among competing theories

scientific article published on 17 June 2016

Evolution of sex: Using experimental genomics to select among competing theories is …
instance of (P31):
review articleQ7318358
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1002/BIES.201600074
P698PubMed publication ID27315146

P50authorSarah OttoQ7422662
P2093author name stringNathaniel P Sharp
P2860cites workThe Evolutionary Enigma of SexQ22066104
EVOLUTION OF SEXRESOLVING THE PARADOX OF SEX AND RECOMBINATIONQ22121995
Interference among deleterious mutations favours sex and recombination in finite populationsQ22122238
Sex increases the efficacy of natural selection in experimental yeast populationsQ22122472
Sex releases the speed limit on evolutionQ22122522
Running with the Red Queen: host-parasite coevolution selects for biparental sexQ24630269
Why sex and recombination?Q28283292
THE RELATION OF RECOMBINATION TO MUTATIONAL ADVANCEQ29616118
The evolution of sex is favoured during adaptation to new environmentsQ31061059
Recombination speeds adaptation by reducing competition between beneficial mutations in populations of Escherichia coliQ33294903
Host-parasite 'Red Queen' dynamics archived in pond sedimentQ33305626
Parasite adaptation to locally common host genotypesQ33906650
The red queen coupled with directional selection favours the evolution of sex.Q34154985
Ancient asexual scandals.Q34159189
Deleterious mutations and the evolution of sexual reproductionQ34164458
Sex enhances adaptation by unlinking beneficial from detrimental mutations in experimental yeast populationsQ34214176
Species interactions and the evolution of sex.Q34320816
Pervasive genetic hitchhiking and clonal interference in forty evolving yeast populationsQ34358875
Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networksQ34498906
Drift increases the advantage of sex in RNA bacteriophage Phi6.Q34643339
Crowded growth leads to the spontaneous evolution of semistable coexistence in laboratory yeast populations.Q35736793
The evolution of sex and recombination in response to abiotic or coevolutionary fluctuations in epistasisQ35757735
The evolution of sex: empirical insights into the roles of epistasis and driftQ36710753
A genome-wide view of the spectrum of spontaneous mutations in yeast.Q36756806
An Evolving Genetic Architecture Interacts with Hill-Robertson Interference to Determine the Benefit of Sex.Q36976911
Why are sex and recombination so common?Q37193328
The effect of sex on the mean and variance of fitness in facultatively sexual rotifersQ37822889
Microbial evolution. Global epistasis makes adaptation predictable despite sequence-level stochasticityQ39169158
Diminishing returns epistasis among beneficial mutations decelerates adaptationQ39954065
Sex speeds adaptation by altering the dynamics of molecular evolution.Q40947611
Molecular characterization of clonal interference during adaptive evolution in asexual populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiaeQ41182739
Deleterious mutations, variable epistatic interactions, and the evolution of recombination.Q41486670
Higher rates of sex evolve in spatially heterogeneous environmentsQ43922104
Negative epistasis between beneficial mutations in an evolving bacterial populationQ44010374
Eco-evolutionary feedback promotes Red Queen dynamics and selects for sex in predator populations.Q46592456
Evolution: The End of an Ancient Asexual ScandalQ47324413
The ecology and genetics of fitness in Chlamydomonas. XII. Repeated sexual episodes increase rates of adaptation to novel environments.Q51198876
Frequency-dependent selection, beneficial mutations, and the evolution of sex.Q52387861
Some Genetic Aspects of SexQ56235384
Deleterious mutations as an evolutionary factor: 1. The advantage of recombinationQ56341012
Sex versus Non-Sex versus ParasiteQ57486487
P433issue8
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectgenomicsQ222046
P304page(s)751-757
P577publication date2016-06-17
P1433published inBioEssaysQ4914614
P1476titleEvolution of sex: Using experimental genomics to select among competing theories
P478volume38