The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors' reporting of statistics and use of open research practices

scientific article

The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors' reporting of statistics and use of open research practices is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P819ADS bibcode2017PLoSO..1275583G
P356DOI10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0175583
P932PMC publication ID5393581
P698PubMed publication ID28414751

P50authorPatrizio TressoldiQ30347643
P2093author name stringGeoff Cumming
David Giofrè
Ingrid Boedker
Luca Fresc
P2860cites workAre We Wasting a Good Crisis? The Availability of Psychological Research Data after the StormQ56083153
Publish (your data) or (let the data) perish! Why not publish your data too?Q56083154
Why most published research findings are falseQ21092395
Why publishing everything is more effective than selective publishing of statistically significant resultsQ23307991
Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing TransparencyQ24052598
Editors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence?Q24273213
The pervasive avoidance of prospective statistical power: major consequences and practical solutionsQ24273338
Willingness to share research data is related to the strength of the evidence and the quality of reporting of statistical resultsQ24288714
The poor availability of psychological research data for reanalysisQ28267735
The prevalence of statistical reporting errors in psychology (1985-2013)Q28596108
SCIENTIFIC STANDARDS. Promoting an open research cultureQ28608410
Statistical Reporting Errors and Collaboration on Statistical Analyses in Psychological ScienceQ28650001
Estimating the reproducibility of psychological scienceQ28922478
The (mis)reporting of statistical results in psychology journalsQ28923488
Playing with Data--Or How to Discourage Questionable Research Practices and Stimulate Researchers to Do Things RightQ30919223
Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: comment on Bem (2011).Q33807638
Outlier removal and the relation with reporting errors and quality of psychological researchQ33968563
Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth TellingQ34031507
A Vast Graveyard of Undead Theories: Publication Bias and Psychological Science's Aversion to the NullQ34484639
Questionable research practices among italian research psychologistsQ36309082
On the persistence of low power in psychological scienceQ37126950
Outlier removal, sum scores, and the inflation of the Type I error rate in independent samples t tests: the power of alternatives and recommendationsQ38207713
Business not as usualQ44016260
(Un)available upon request: field experiment on researchers' willingness to share supplementary materials.Q45236944
The new statistics: why and how.Q51142198
Reform of statistical inference in psychology: the case of memory & cognitionQ51998031
Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in PsychologyQ53464577
P275copyright licenseCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 InternationalQ20007257
P6216copyright statuscopyrightedQ50423863
P433issue4
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P921main subjectstatisticsQ12483
open researchQ309849
P304page(s)e0175583
P577publication date2017-04-17
P1433published inPLOS OneQ564954
P1476titleThe influence of journal submission guidelines on authors' reporting of statistics and use of open research practices
P478volume12

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q59222126A Standard for the Scholarly Citation of Archaeological Data as an Incentive to Data Sharing
Q60956807Current Practices in Data Analysis Procedures in Psychology: What Has Changed?
Q108127012Data management and sharing: Practices and perceptions of psychology researchers
Q54527979Data sharing in PLOS ONE: An analysis of Data Availability Statements
Q91743284Did awarding badges increase data sharing in BMJ Open? A randomized controlled trial
Q92893632Estimation for Better Inference in Neuroscience
Q45943629Fact or fiction: reducing the proportion and impact of false positives.
Q55496372Perceived Statistical Knowledge Level and Self-Reported Statistical Practice Among Academic Psychologists.
Q36348657Sharing Data and Materials in Psychological Science
Q93150448The citation advantage of linking publications to research data
Q45951514The poor availability of syntaxes of structural equation modeling.
Q91830002Verify original results through reanalysis before replicating
Q60937894Why we need to report more than 'Data were Analyzed by t-tests or ANOVA'

Search more.