scholarly article | Q13442814 |
P356 | DOI | 10.1017/S003329171700294X |
P698 | PubMed publication ID | 29173233 |
P2093 | author name string | A Pickles | |
D Stahl | |||
P2860 | cites work | Why most published research findings are false | Q21092395 |
"Positive" results increase down the Hierarchy of the Sciences | Q21136404 | ||
How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data | Q21143770 | ||
Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection | Q21284241 | ||
The Elements of Statistical Learning | Q22670878 | ||
Editors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence? | Q24273213 | ||
The Rules of the Game Called Psychological Science | Q24273219 | ||
P-curve: A key to the file-drawer | Q51186445 | ||
Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. | Q51848247 | ||
Ridge Regression: Biased Estimation for Nonorthogonal Problems | Q56031697 | ||
Regression Modeling Strategies | Q56170489 | ||
Harold Jeffreys’s default Bayes factor hypothesis tests: Explanation, extension, and application in psychology | Q56432279 | ||
A new framework to enhance the interpretation of external validation studies of clinical prediction models | Q57393274 | ||
Applied Predictive Modeling | Q62089303 | ||
Bias in Jurors vs Bias in Juries: New Evidence from the SDS Perspective | Q73046856 | ||
An experimental investigation of the effect of unstable interpersonal relations in a group | Q73618494 | ||
Discussion: Difficulties in making inferences about scientific truth from distributions of published p-values | Q86039891 | ||
False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant | Q24273231 | ||
The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey | Q24282603 | ||
Meta-analyses triggered by previous (false-)significant findings: problems and solutions | Q24288844 | ||
The Statistical Crisis in Science | Q24492515 | ||
An overview of conducting systematic reviews with network meta-analysis | Q26827222 | ||
Is there an excess of significant findings in published studies of psychotherapy for depression? | Q26991727 | ||
Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking | Q28070196 | ||
A manifesto for reproducible science | Q28341964 | ||
The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational study | Q28650039 | ||
To Explain or to Predict? | Q29030663 | ||
Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials | Q29620299 | ||
The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors' reporting of statistics and use of open research practices | Q30491421 | ||
Betulin is a potent anti-tumor agent that is enhanced by cholesterol | Q30862438 | ||
Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: comment on Bem (2011). | Q33807638 | ||
Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence. | Q34081552 | ||
Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect | Q34161614 | ||
Adjusting for multiple testing--when and how? | Q34215794 | ||
Statistical Evidence in Experimental Psychology: An Empirical Comparison Using 855 t Tests | Q34671601 | ||
Evaluation of excess significance bias in animal studies of neurological diseases | Q34844822 | ||
Triangulating meta-analyses: the example of the serotonin transporter gene, stressful life events and major depression | Q36034031 | ||
How do you design randomised trials for smaller populations? A framework. | Q36203629 | ||
Poor replication validity of biomedical association studies reported by newspapers | Q36286246 | ||
Parental depressive and anxiety symptoms during pregnancy and attention problems in children: a cross-cohort consistency study | Q37230268 | ||
Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysis | Q37329334 | ||
UNIFORMLY MOST POWERFUL BAYESIAN TESTS. | Q37649564 | ||
Low statistical power in biomedical science: a review of three human research domains | Q37722079 | ||
The need to consider the wider agenda in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: breadth, timing, and depth of the evidence | Q37788443 | ||
Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On? | Q38546092 | ||
Are Psychology Journals Anti-replication? A Snapshot of Editorial Practices | Q39218605 | ||
Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors | Q39605793 | ||
Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare? | Q40923138 | ||
Business not as usual | Q44016260 | ||
Comparison of large versus smaller randomized trials for mental health-related interventions | Q45292033 | ||
Replication studies: Bad copy | Q46759683 | ||
The new statistics: why and how. | Q51142198 | ||
P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
P304 | page(s) | 1-10 | |
P577 | publication date | 2017-11-27 | |
P1433 | published in | Psychological Medicine | Q7256364 |
P1476 | title | Fact or fiction: reducing the proportion and impact of false positives. |
Q96343192 | Computing schizophrenia: ethical challenges for machine learning in psychiatry |
Q64087539 | Does Fractional Anisotropy Predict Motor Imagery Neurofeedback Performance in Healthy Older Adults? |
Q55715082 | Open Science Is Liberating and Can Foster Creativity. |
Q100449930 | Relationship between jumping to conclusions and clinical outcomes in people at clinical high-risk for psychosis |
Search more.