Fact or fiction: reducing the proportion and impact of false positives.

scientific article published on 27 November 2017

Fact or fiction: reducing the proportion and impact of false positives. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1017/S003329171700294X
P698PubMed publication ID29173233

P2093author name stringA Pickles
D Stahl
P2860cites workWhy most published research findings are falseQ21092395
"Positive" results increase down the Hierarchy of the SciencesQ21136404
How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey dataQ21143770
Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selectionQ21284241
The Elements of Statistical LearningQ22670878
Editors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence?Q24273213
The Rules of the Game Called Psychological ScienceQ24273219
P-curve: A key to the file-drawerQ51186445
Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis.Q51848247
Ridge Regression: Biased Estimation for Nonorthogonal ProblemsQ56031697
Regression Modeling StrategiesQ56170489
Harold Jeffreys’s default Bayes factor hypothesis tests: Explanation, extension, and application in psychologyQ56432279
A new framework to enhance the interpretation of external validation studies of clinical prediction modelsQ57393274
Applied Predictive ModelingQ62089303
Bias in Jurors vs Bias in Juries: New Evidence from the SDS PerspectiveQ73046856
An experimental investigation of the effect of unstable interpersonal relations in a groupQ73618494
Discussion: Difficulties in making inferences about scientific truth from distributions of published p-valuesQ86039891
False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as SignificantQ24273231
The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large surveyQ24282603
Meta-analyses triggered by previous (false-)significant findings: problems and solutionsQ24288844
The Statistical Crisis in ScienceQ24492515
An overview of conducting systematic reviews with network meta-analysisQ26827222
Is there an excess of significant findings in published studies of psychotherapy for depression?Q26991727
Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-HackingQ28070196
A manifesto for reproducible scienceQ28341964
The association between exaggeration in health related science news and academic press releases: retrospective observational studyQ28650039
To Explain or to Predict?Q29030663
Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trialsQ29620299
The influence of journal submission guidelines on authors' reporting of statistics and use of open research practicesQ30491421
Betulin is a potent anti-tumor agent that is enhanced by cholesterolQ30862438
Why psychologists must change the way they analyze their data: the case of psi: comment on Bem (2011).Q33807638
Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence.Q34081552
Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affectQ34161614
Adjusting for multiple testing--when and how?Q34215794
Statistical Evidence in Experimental Psychology: An Empirical Comparison Using 855 t TestsQ34671601
Evaluation of excess significance bias in animal studies of neurological diseasesQ34844822
Triangulating meta-analyses: the example of the serotonin transporter gene, stressful life events and major depressionQ36034031
How do you design randomised trials for smaller populations? A framework.Q36203629
Poor replication validity of biomedical association studies reported by newspapersQ36286246
Parental depressive and anxiety symptoms during pregnancy and attention problems in children: a cross-cohort consistency studyQ37230268
Interpretation of tests of heterogeneity and bias in meta-analysisQ37329334
UNIFORMLY MOST POWERFUL BAYESIAN TESTS.Q37649564
Low statistical power in biomedical science: a review of three human research domainsQ37722079
The need to consider the wider agenda in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: breadth, timing, and depth of the evidenceQ37788443
Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On?Q38546092
Are Psychology Journals Anti-replication? A Snapshot of Editorial PracticesQ39218605
Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errorsQ39605793
Large trials vs meta-analysis of smaller trials: how do their results compare?Q40923138
Business not as usualQ44016260
Comparison of large versus smaller randomized trials for mental health-related interventionsQ45292033
Replication studies: Bad copyQ46759683
The new statistics: why and how.Q51142198
P407language of work or nameEnglishQ1860
P304page(s)1-10
P577publication date2017-11-27
P1433published inPsychological MedicineQ7256364
P1476titleFact or fiction: reducing the proportion and impact of false positives.

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q96343192Computing schizophrenia: ethical challenges for machine learning in psychiatry
Q64087539Does Fractional Anisotropy Predict Motor Imagery Neurofeedback Performance in Healthy Older Adults?
Q55715082Open Science Is Liberating and Can Foster Creativity.
Q100449930Relationship between jumping to conclusions and clinical outcomes in people at clinical high-risk for psychosis

Search more.