| scholarly article | Q13442814 |
| P50 | author | Gregory Francis | Q61770415 |
| P2093 | author name string | William J Matthews | |
| Jay Tanzman | |||
| P2860 | cites work | Writing About Testing Worries Boosts Exam Performance in the Classroom | Q50648624 |
| The Psychology of Replication and Replication in Psychology. | Q50930790 | ||
| The new statistics: why and how. | Q51142198 | ||
| The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles | Q51329567 | ||
| A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values | Q51898263 | ||
| Publication bias in “Red, rank, and romance in women viewing men,” by Elliot et al. (2010) | Q55057014 | ||
| When a good fit can be bad | Q78467093 | ||
| SNOOP:a program for demonstrating the consequences of premature and repeated null hypothesis testing | Q79831522 | ||
| Some consequences of having too little | Q85336323 | ||
| Retraction. Visual perspective influences the use of metacognitive information in temporal comparisons | Q87357513 | ||
| Behavioral priming: it's all in the mind, but whose mind? | Q21089914 | ||
| Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries | Q24273200 | ||
| Editors' Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science: A Crisis of Confidence? | Q24273213 | ||
| Publication bias and the failure of replication in experimental psychology | Q24273214 | ||
| An exploratory test for an excess of significant findings | Q24273224 | ||
| Too good to be true: Publication bias in two prominent studies from experimental psychology | Q24273228 | ||
| False-Positive Psychology: Undisclosed Flexibility in Data Collection and Analysis Allows Presenting Anything as Significant | Q24273231 | ||
| Scientific Utopia: II. Restructuring Incentives and Practices to Promote Truth Over Publishability | Q24273236 | ||
| Capuchin monkeys display affiliation toward humans who imitate them | Q24651260 | ||
| Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias | Q27860653 | ||
| The perception of rational, goal-directed action in nonhuman primates | Q28247063 | ||
| Optimally Interacting Minds | Q29468525 | ||
| Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience | Q29547474 | ||
| Incidental Haptic Sensations Influence Social Judgments and Decisions | Q30050570 | ||
| The subtle transmission of race bias via televised nonverbal behavior | Q30544165 | ||
| Bayesian data analysis | Q30987243 | ||
| On making the right choice: the deliberation-without-attention effect | Q33993599 | ||
| Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling | Q34031507 | ||
| Thought for food: imagined consumption reduces actual consumption. | Q34154279 | ||
| Feeling the future: Experimental evidence for anomalous retroactive influences on cognition and affect | Q34161614 | ||
| Coping with Chaos: How Disordered Contexts Promote Stereotyping and Discrimination | Q34176714 | ||
| Analytic Thinking Promotes Religious Disbelief | Q34271353 | ||
| HARKing: hypothesizing after the results are known | Q34383905 | ||
| A Vast Graveyard of Undead Theories: Publication Bias and Psychological Science's Aversion to the Null | Q34484639 | ||
| An Agenda for Purely Confirmatory Research | Q34484661 | ||
| Washing away your sins: threatened morality and physical cleansing | Q34564552 | ||
| Priming Intelligent Behavior: An Elusive Phenomenon | Q34699855 | ||
| Lacking control increases illusory pattern perception | Q34844318 | ||
| Blue or red? Exploring the effect of color on cognitive task performances | Q34938559 | ||
| Publication bias in recent meta-analyses | Q35074341 | ||
| The same old New Look: Publication bias in a study of wishful seeing. | Q36362140 | ||
| Optimal experimental design for model discrimination | Q37345770 | ||
| We Knew the Future All Along: Scientific Hypothesizing is Much More Accurate Than Other Forms of Precognition-A Satire in One Part | Q39624001 | ||
| The Social Sense: Susceptibility to Others’ Beliefs in Human Infants and Adults | Q39796896 | ||
| How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing | Q41733124 | ||
| Too much success for recent groundbreaking epigenetic experiments | Q42943824 | ||
| Evidence that publication bias contaminated studies relating social class and unethical behavior. | Q43204984 | ||
| The frequency of excess success for articles in Psychological Science | Q43419573 | ||
| A peculiar prevalence of p values just below .05. | Q43447558 | ||
| Why hypothesis tests are essential for psychological science: a comment on Cumming (2014). | Q43912838 | ||
| Replication studies: Bad copy | Q46759683 | ||
| Promoting the Middle East peace process by changing beliefs about group malleability | Q47271289 | ||
| The psychological consequences of money. | Q48423913 | ||
| Stop Signals Provide Cross Inhibition in Collective Decision-Making by Honeybee Swarms | Q48788343 | ||
| P275 | copyright license | Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International | Q20007257 |
| P6216 | copyright status | copyrighted | Q50423863 |
| P433 | issue | 12 | |
| P407 | language of work or name | English | Q1860 |
| P304 | page(s) | e114255 | |
| P577 | publication date | 2014-12-04 | |
| P1433 | published in | PLOS One | Q564954 |
| P1476 | title | Excess success for psychology articles in the journal science | |
| P478 | volume | 9 |
| Q92893639 | 2D:4D Suggests a Role of Prenatal Testosterone in Gender Dysphoria |
| Q24288636 | Conservative Tests under Satisficing Models of Publication Bias |
| Q36289668 | Direct replication of Gervais & Norenzayan (2012): No evidence that analytic thinking decreases religious belief |
| Q38939922 | Does psychotherapy work? An umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials |
| Q30646384 | Excess success for three related papers on racial bias |
| Q58169127 | HARKing's Threat to Organizational Research: Evidence From Primary and Meta-Analytic Sources |
| Q27691402 | Implications of "Too Good to Be True" for Replication, Theoretical Claims, and Experimental Design: An Example Using Prominent Studies of Racial Bias. |
| Q28597997 | Internal conceptual replications do not increase independent replication success |
| Q99544121 | Meta Research: Questionable research practices may have little effect on replicability |
| Q24288654 | No Effect of Weight on Judgments of Importance in the Moral Domain and Evidence of Publication Bias from a Meta-Analysis |
| Q36309082 | Questionable research practices among italian research psychologists |
| Q57248833 | The replication paradox: Combining studies can decrease accuracy of effect size estimates |
Search more.