Different rates of forgetting following study versus test trials.

scientific article published in November 2003

Different rates of forgetting following study versus test trials. is …
instance of (P31):
scholarly articleQ13442814

External links are
P356DOI10.1080/09658210244000414
P698PubMed publication ID14982124

P2093author name stringMichael Ewers
Joseph F Buonanno
Mark A Wheeler
P2860cites workThe influence of retrieval on retentionQ34541521
Some effects of remembering on forgetting.Q52094211
Some Theorems on Quadratic Forms Applied in the Study of Analysis of Variance Problems, II. Effects of Inequality of Variance and of Correlation Between Errors in the Two-Way ClassificationQ56037786
Evaluating forgetting curvesQ56048098
Studies in retentionQ56061338
P433issue6
P304page(s)571-580
P577publication date2003-11-01
P1433published inMemoryQ15753954
P1476titleDifferent rates of forgetting following study versus test trials.
P478volume11

Reverse relations

cites work (P2860)
Q50777394A test of the testing effect: acquiring problem-solving skills from worked examples.
Q38536552Accelerated forgetting? An evaluation on the use of long-term forgetting rates in patients with memory problems
Q37418507Attention during memory retrieval enhances future remembering
Q50422250Comparison of a newly established emotional stimulus approach to a classical assessment-driven approach in BLS training: a randomised controlled trial.
Q35988873Decomposing the interaction between retention interval and study/test practice: the role of retrievability
Q36955408Desirable Difficulties in Vocabulary Learning.
Q50476076Distributed retrieval practice promotes superior recall of anatomy information.
Q34655799Do testing effects change over time? Insights from immediate and delayed retrieval speed
Q50524653Effects of successive relearning on recall: Does relearning override the effects of initial learning criterion?
Q46053152Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: choices and consequences
Q38496802Enhancing visuospatial learning: the benefit of retrieval practice
Q57794170Enhancing workplace digital learning by use of the science of learning
Q36053961Errorless learning in cognitive rehabilitation: a critical review
Q51894006Examining the efficiency of schedules of distributed retrieval practice.
Q51901741Expanding retrieval practice: an effective aid to preschool children's learning.
Q30459735Improving Students' Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology
Q51893041Influence of re-exposure and retrieval disruption during group collaboration on later individual recall.
Q35633072Initial retrieval shields against retrieval-induced forgetting
Q51022403Inoculating against eyewitness suggestibility via interpolated verbatim vs. gist testing.
Q50547606Is retrieval the key? Metamemory judgment and testing as learning strategies.
Q58305072Known, lost, and recovered: Efficacy of formal‐semantic therapy and spaced retrieval method in a case of semantic dementia
Q30474342Learning Versus Performance
Q51859797Long-term effects of testing on the recall of nontested materials.
Q88913776Metacognitive control in self-regulated learning: Conditions affecting the choice of restudying versus retrieval practice
Q50657541Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals.
Q59798628On the very-long-term effect of managing one’s own memory: The intention to forget improves recognition after a year’s delay
Q64087135Open-Book Versus Closed-Book Tests in University Classes: A Field Experiment
Q51004617Practice makes transfer of motor skills imperfect.
Q30710360Recovering and preventing loss of detailed memory: differential rates of forgetting for detail types in episodic memory
Q50722411Repeated testing, item selection, and relearning: the benefits of testing outweigh the costs.
Q88683763Retrieval and sleep both counteract the forgetting of spatial information
Q52574853Retrieval practice in the form of online homework improved information retention more when spaced 5 days rather than 1 day after class in two physiology courses.
Q51035147Scaffolding feedback to maximize long-term error correction
Q50546540Self-testing produces superior recall of both familiar and unfamiliar muscle information.
Q34531718Strengthening concept learning by repeated testing
Q48407613Study for now, but judge for later: delayed judgments of learning promote long-term retention
Q39687733Test-enhanced learning of clinical reasoning: a crossover randomised trial.
Q34498251Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention
Q46071278Testing beyond words: using tests to enhance visuospatial map learning
Q50703628Testing promotes long-term learning via stabilizing activation patterns in a large network of brain areas.
Q51012351Testing the limits of testing effects using completion tests.
Q50755558The "pure-study" learning curve: the learning curve without cumulative testing.
Q37687991The Effects of Test Trial and Processing Level on Immediate and Delayed Retention
Q44022838The benefits of testing for learning on later performance
Q34624413The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention
Q38640324The effect of recall, reproduction, and restudy on word learning: a pre-registered study
Q33329635The effects of tests on learning and forgetting
Q50776663The origin of the interaction between learning method and delay in the testing effect: the roles of processing and conceptual retrieval organization.
Q51934721The testing effect and the retention interval: questions and answers.
Q30841467Towards a Theory of Learning for Naming Rehabilitation: Retrieval Practice and Spacing Effects
Q35125053Uncovering the neural mechanisms underlying learning from tests
Q58785792Undesirable Difficulty Effects in the Learning of High-Element Interactivity Materials
Q92086010Using online game-based platforms to improve student performance and engagement in histology teaching
Q38398989What types of learning are enhanced by a cued recall test?
Q36924031fMRI exploration of pedagogical benefits of repeated testing: when more is not always better

Search more.